Monday, March 14, 2016

THE CFSA AS A CHILD AND YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH INTERVENTION


We know that early intervention is critical to the prevention of mental health problems and studies have shown that interventions timed during the early years can have positive effects later in life. Funding for children and youth services is gaining public attention and attempts are being made to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a great variety of programs and services within our hospitals, clinics and research institutions.  Fortunately 85-90% of children and youth in our society are provided with a strong foundation and grow up in loving families with basic preventive programs and services that lead to successful lives[i]. Unfortunately, 5-10% of children and youth grow up facing challenges in their lives – from physical health or emotional challenges, to relationship problems at home, with their peers, or in their communities.
How are these issues being addressed? - One approach to address mental health issues is prevention and early identification and intervention with sound evidenced-based programs and services to prevent ongoing difficulties later in life.  Another approach is to focus on the children and youth who have not been identified early and have missed opportunities to benefit from needed services. One of the interventions that have been available for many years is through child welfare agencies using Nova Scotia’s Children and Family Services Act (CFSA). Some think of the CFSA legislation as an intervention of last resort, and for some it is, but it also includes provisions that can intervene at any stage of the child’s development from birth to 18 years inclusive to try and prevent or address mental health problems faced by children and youth.
What role can the Child Welfare System play? - Realizing that some children will be left out of the early attempts to introduce them to services, attempts have been made recently to improve the child welfare system. The Department of Community Services introduced amendments to the Children and Family Services Act (CFSA)[ii] in December 2015 to provide interventions that will make it possible to introduce services even at a late stage of development.
Referrals to child welfare services require the social worker to complete a thorough assessment of the family situation including the physical and mental problems faced by the child as well as the responsibility of the parent in addressing the problems. Section 12A (a-g) of the amended Children and Family Services Act, spells out the duties required by the social worker when investigating a referral and requires the social worker to carry out their duties “regardless of whether the social worker has consent of a parent or guardian of the child” [section 12A (2)]. This recognizes that some parents may not be able or willing to cooperate with recommended treatment but this provision ensures that the prime focus here is the welfare and best interests of the child.
Services to Promote the Integrity of the Family: An important part of the initial assessment by the social worker is the need to provide services to “promote the integrity of the family” and to enable children to remain safely in their home if at all possible. Section 13 (1)&(2) specifically emphasizes an obligation of the agency to take “reasonable measures to provide services” and also lists, without limitation, the type of services that can be offered by the agency or offered in combination with an independent community service or program. The initial visit assessment by the social worker is to determine if the child has been harmed or in danger and needs to be removed to a safe environment. If the child is not in immediate danger further assessment is done to determine if the child can remain in the home with referral to appropriate services to assist the parent to care for their child. If referral to services does not alleviate the parent or family issues causing the child to continue to be at risk of harm then the agency may need to bring the situation to the attention of the court.
How does the legislation identify children and youth who are in need of mental health services?  Using the legislation to provide services or placement implies that the parent is not able to take action or refuses to cooperate or is directly responsible for the child’s condition and action needs to be taken to provide services to the child. The legislation also signifies that the parent is expected to cooperate when recommendations are made by medical professionals for the child’s treatment. With respect to a child who exhibits emotional harm [defined in section 3(1)(la)], there are amendments that relate emotional harm to the parent’s role in causing the harm and for the parent to take specific actions such as, to “co-operate with the provision of services or treatment to alleviate or eliminate the harm” [section 22(2)(g)].This is to ensure that the child gets attention for any harm or risk of harm they have received.
With respect to a mental, emotional or developmental condition of the child that, if not remedied, could lead to serious impairment, again the amendments require that the parent take specific responsibility such as be available to consent to, and cooperate with the provision of services or treatment to remedy or alleviate the condition [section 22(2)(h)].
With respect to the exposure of the child to violence in the home directly or indirectly, parents have responsibilities such as to obtain services or treatment for the child or take other measures to prevent or alleviate the violence [section 22(2)(i)].
With respect to children and youth under 16 years, the agency is required to provide less intrusive child care services, defined in section 13(2), in order to keep families together before removal of the child, if that is appropriate. There are also situations where a child needs placement in a child caring facility and the legislation allows the parent to enter into a Temporary Care Agreement (section 17) for the purpose of receiving child care services or placement out of the home with the prospect of return at a future date.
With respect to children and youth under 16 with special needs, a parent may enter into a Special Needs Agreement with an agency to provide services if the parent is unable to provide the care the child needs [section 18(1)] which includes residential services in a child-caring facility. A child has special needs “if the child has a need that is related to or caused by a behavioural, emotional, physical, mental or other handicap or disorder”[iii].
Due to the amended definition of a child, now defined in the Act as being under 19 years, [section 3(1)(e], youth between 16-18 years inclusive, can enter into a Service Agreement with an agency to receive child-care services or placement in a child-caring facility as long as there is no parent willing to assume responsibility for the youth [section 19(1)]. In addition, youth between 16-18 years may enter into a written agreement with an agency to provide for a placement or assistance in obtaining a placement [section 19A(1)].
Using the court to provide services – This option may be used after attempts have been made to offer and provide services to help a parent voluntarily improve their home situation so that a child’s physical and mental health needs are met. When voluntary intervention has not been successful, the agency may make an application to bring the matter before the court [section 32] or may take the child into care [section 33(1)] and present evidence that the child is in need of protective services as defined in section 22(2). Once before the court a plan of care for the child is presented by the agency and a number of options are available including, an order for supervision of the child in the home and referral of the child or parents for “assessment, treatment or provision of services” [section 39(4)(g)]. When there is disagreement on the plan of care another alternative is for the court to refer the parties to “conferencing” [section 40(1)(b)] with strict timelines to ensure that any disputes are resolved in a timely manner. “The purpose of conferencing is to facilitate the timely resolution of the issues that resulted in the proceeding being commenced in a manner that is consensual and that serves the child’s best interests” [section 40(A) (1)]. During the initial conference the agency is required to propose a service plan for the child which is then discussed by the parties for implementation. It is important to realize that when the agency brings the matter to the attention of the court it is the court, after hearing evidence that makes the final decision which will affect the child’s future. 
Conclusion – The preferred method of addressing mental health problems is to identify them in the early years of life or as soon as they become evident to parents or medical and educational professionals. Unfortunately, the problems of some children are missed in the early stages and are only observed later in childhood or adolescence. A number of interventions have been listed to address the mental health of children and youth under the CFSA legislation. In addition, for children and youth who cannot be cared for by their parents or their parents are uncooperative, or have contributed to physical or emotional harm, the agency can use the court to ensure that the child or youth is living in a safe environment and receiving needed services. However, it is important to state that in order for these interventions to take place it is necessary to have adequate resources that are readily accessible within the community.



[iii] CFSA Regulations, section 37(1)(b) ( accessed: 21/01/16) http://www.novascotia.ca/just/regulations/regs/cfsregs.htm


[ii] Bill 112, An Act to Amend Chapter 5 of the Acts of 1990, the Children and Family Services Act CHAPTER 37 ACTS OF 2015 AS ASSENTED TO BY THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DECEMBER 18, 2015. Province of Nova Scotia


[i] Our Kids are Worth It: A Strategy for Children and Youth. (p.13). Province of Nova Scotia

Friday, October 30, 2015

WHAT IS AN EFFECTIVE ANTI-POVERTY TOOL?


What is not effective in lifting people out of poverty is an increase in the minimum wage. In an article written by Ron Kneebone,The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, raising the minimum wage for working people does nothing to alleviate poverty, end homelessness, and improve the lives of persons with disabilities. He makes the case that people who would benefit from an increase in the minimum wage would be people who are working and the main problem with people living in poverty is that they cannot find employment. Furthermore, the people earning minimum wages are mostly young people between 15 and 24 years of age, working part-time, living with family or attending school (Statscan 2010). Programs targeting poverty directly would be a more appropriate use of funds. “An effective anti-poverty tool is one that targets those who are poor and provides them with a higher income.” Mr. Kneebone concludes that governments who want to effectively address poverty issues should “should focus on targeted income support programs that benefit not only those earning low wages but also those unable to find employment”. See the article at: Click Here

Thursday, December 19, 2013

AN EXTERNAL CHILD AND YOUTH ADVOCATE


Nova Scotia does not have a child and youth advocate contrary to most other provinces. Is a child advocate necessary to address the current system of service for children and youth? Are there enough checks and balances already in the system to ensure that persistent problems get addressed? If childhood is seen on a continuum with interventions beginning from birth to three years, at preschool/day care, at the entrance to the education system (primary, junior high and senior high), and finally on to adulthood, can we identify the children and youth who are repeatedly left out? If we look first at the vivid examples of youth at the end of the spectrum such as their mental health, involvement in crime, unmanageable/aggressive/self-destructive behaviour, sexual violence, bullying and cyberbullying, and the impact of social media to mention a few, it becomes obvious that intervention needs to occur early in the childhood cycle. If we could intervene early we might be able to identify those children who will develop problems later in life.

The government has at least two strategies that have been developed to address the problems of children and youth. The Child and Youth Strategy, “Our Children are Worth It” (2007) developed after the Nunn Commission Enquiry Report (2006) recommended a stronger collaboration and cooperation between the four government departments of Community Services, Health and Wellness, Education and Early Childhood Development, and Justice. The Child and Youth Strategy makes an honest effort to find new ways of providing services to children and youth, some of which are experimental, that tries to make access easier and to fill gaps. Its legacy will be a more coordinated approach to service provision from the top government level to the service provider at the community level.

Over the past six years the Child and Youth Strategy has experimented with a number of initiatives that have been tested and found to meet qualitative tests to show their effectiveness. One of those initiatives is the SchoolsPlus program which was started under the Child and Youth Strategy and later adopted and expanded by the Mental Health and Addictions Strategy, “Together We Can” (2012) under the Department of Health and Wellness.

The SchoolsPlus program follows the lead of several other national and international jurisdictions. It uses the school as a platform to launch services to meet the needs of children, youth and families as well as traditional education. An important initiative of the program is the placement of mental health clinicians in SchoolsPlus schools. This is particularly significant in rural communities where resources are scarce or located at long distances.  The program offers a familiar space for families to meet and encourages the co-location of community-based services.  However, how effective is this program in terms of early identification of learning, developmental and mental health problems? Does it provide better access to services? Are gaps in services for certain services identified? Does it diminish long wait times for services? Is it adequately resources with qualified professionals? All these questions depend on adequate financial resources. Is the government committed to provide these resources without which the program and strategy may fail?

Shedding light on these questions is where an independent Child and Youth Advocate with a broad mandate would be effective. The government strategies have made progress and have identified the direction that needs to be taken in order to meet the needs of children, youth and families. What is required now is an independent authority with broad powers to investigate complaints about the system, gather information, analyse outcomes, report its findings and recommendations to the Legislature, and to encourage government to make changes. Some gaps in services that persist and continue to impact child and youth mental health are: relevant and accessible information programs that address problems parents encounter raising their children; follow-up of high risk children between the ages of three and five when home visits end and until they enter school; children under 12 who commit crimes of violence or destroy property but cannot be charged; high risk youth between 16 and 18 years who are between the child welfare mandate and age of majority; children’s over exposure to the viewing of violence in films and video games; the influence of social media on individual and family relationships; the service gaps between different geographic regions especially in rural areas; and service gaps in programs for diverse cultures. The strategies have addressed some of these gaps but an advocate for children and youth could independently identify and focus attention on the ones requiring urgent attention.
A child and youth advocate would provide the oversight that would identify gaps in services as experienced by the service users. It’s time for Nova Scotia to join the other eight provinces with advocates in place to independently examine the strategies to address problems expressed by children and youth and to advocate for effective change.

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

SCHOOLSPLUS


SCHOOLSPLUS – A Nova Scotia program that places vital human services in safe and convenient locations in both rural and urban communities. The program delivers vital support services from government departments and community agencies including Justice, Mental Health, Addiction, Education, Community Services and other service providers in local community schools. Known as SchoolsPlus it has been in operation for the past three years and is part of a growing community schools movement that emphasises integrated/ collaborative service delivery. First proposed in 2007 as a pilot program as part of the provincial Child and Youth Strategy known as “Our Children Are Worth It” and also the Mental Health Strategy known as “Together We Can” (2012), it has undergone extensive evaluation during 2010, 2011 and 2012. The final evaluation completed in September 2012 by an independent evaluator analyses data collected from sites in all eight school boards in the province. The final evaluation confirmed that the program has been received positively by those involved and as a result has been continued and expanded with a substantial financial commitment over the next few years.

Thursday, February 28, 2013

NOVA SCOTIA UNVEILS PLAN TO ADDRESS BULLYING

(Reported in the Chronicle Herald, February 28, 2013) – The long awaited strategy to address bullying has finally been released by Ramona Jennex, Minister of Education. After over a year of consultation and research, the plan is restorative in approach, rather than a strategy based on punishment. Ms. Jennex stated: “This is a plan that’s going to address the root causes of bullying. Therefore, this is going to be a slow, methodical, comprehensive approach.” Relying on the justice system is not effective and what needs to happen is a preventative approach that focuses on peer relationships and the culture of bullying in the school and community. Dr. John LeBlanc, a paediatrician at the IWK Health Centre and a member of the Cyberbullying Task Force, agrees with the province’s approach and states: “That’s why the ‘justice’ approach, finding out who did what, doesn’t work.” “Effective bullying programs deal a lot with peer relationships.” Parents also need to be more involved and social workers are well positioned to offer their expertise in the efforts to improve parent-child relationships, as well as educate and help in understanding the characteristics of bullying. Unfortunately for some families there is not the kind of connection or relationship between parents and their children that will bring bullying out in the open. See the 17 page report: “Speak Up: An Action Plan to Address Bullying and Cyberbullying Behaviour” at:  http://www.ednet.ns.ca/files/reports/R1240223-AntibullyingActionPlan-WEB2.pdf

Saturday, January 12, 2013

TIME TO RECONSIDER RENT CONTROLS


People are beginning to see large increases in rent by some landlords in Halifax. This is especially devastating to persons on low income and fixed incomes. Shane O’Dell writing in the Chronicle Herald on January 12, 2013 quoted the monthly rent for a two bedroom apartment as $145 higher than a similar one in Montreal which has rent control (CMHC statistics). The concern is that with rent controls, landlords will refuse to build more rental units and will go to areas of the country where they are free to set their own rents based on the market. Without rent controls the market will set the going rents and the fear is that when the community experiences a boom time in the economy, as might occur with the proposed ship contract between the federal government and the Halifax Shipyards, large increases in rents will be the norm. According to Mr. O’Dell’s article, Nova Scotia had rent control at one time but it was removed in 1993 and the Minister of the day promised, “If we find one landlord taking advantage of the tenants of this province, we will reactivate the rent review program immediately.” See Mr. O’Dell’s article at: http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/415437-rent-control-empowers-citizens-on-limited-incomes#disqus_thread

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

NOVA SCOTIA SHOWS UP IN THE ECONOMIST


The Economist Newspaper (magazine) is the weekly ‘go to’ publication that the business community and others have been reading for 170 years since it was first published in 1843. The publication promotes the idea that social reform and the economy are closely tied together and contains articles from countries around the world on business, finance and economics, science and technology, education, religion, culture, social unrest, democracy and other topics.  It was interesting to see an article on Nova Scotia which would lead one to believe that important things have been happening that have captured the attention of the editors. The writer recites the many projects that are on the drawing boards and points out that these could spell success, lead the province to prosperity and a needed change in the province’s demographics. The hope is that young people will no longer need to consider moving out of the province in order to find employment. Nova Scotia is considered a “have-not” province and depends on transfer payments from the federal government in order to pay for public services and goods. If workers can find employment here they will stay and raise their families and contribute to the economy. Read the article and other interesting ones at: http://www.economist.com/search/apachesolr_search/A%20New%20Nova%20Scotia